Follow Stars & Wander

I'm totally in support of the writers in theory but I'm trying to understand more of what you're fighting for because I've seen some people on twitter claim writers make more money a week than most of us make in a month so I'm trying to understand what the issue is. Also if that info is accurate. This is a genuine question. Not trying to have a "gotcha moment". I really want to hear from a writer.

Asked by Anonymous

people have always had wild misconceptions about how much a writer earns because of their lack of understanding of how the industry actually works. there’s so many posts about how “you guys make 5k a week. what more do you want?!” yeah…let’s do some math on that.

5k a week for 14 weeks (and that’s a long room. a lot of rooms these days are 8-10 weeks. those are the dreaded mini-rooms we’re trying to kill) is $70,000. for roughly three months of work. you’d think we’re cooking with gas…BUT HOLD UP. that’s gross! let’s see everything that has to come out of that check:

  • 10% to our agent
  • 10% to our manager
  • 5% to our entertainment attorney
  • 5% to our business manager (not everyone has one but a lot of us do. i do, so that’s literally 30% immediately off the top of every check)
  • most of these breakdowns ive seen downplay taxes severely. someone made one that says writers pay 5% in taxes and i would like to ask them “in what universe?”. that doesn’t even cover state taxes. the way taxes work in the industry is really complicated, but the short of it is most of us have companies for tax reasons so we aren’t taxed like people on w2s/1099. if we did we’d be even more fucked. basically every production hires a writer’s company instead of the writer as an individual. so they engage our companies for our services and then at the end of the year we (the company) pay taxes as corporations or llcs (depending on what the writer chose to go with). my company is registered as a “corporation” so let’s go with those rates. california’s corporate rate is 9% and the federal corporate tax rate is 21%. there’s other expenses with running a business like fees and other shit so my business managers/accountants/bookkeepers have recommended i save between 35-40% of everything i make for when tax season comes.

you see where the math is at already??? 25-30% in commissions and then 35-40% in taxes. on the lower end you’re at THE VERY LEAST looking at 60% of that check gone. 70% worst case scenario. suddenly those $70,000 people claim we make are actually down to $28,000 as the take home pay. and that’s if you’re only losing 60%. it goes down to $21,000 if it’s 70%.

lets pretend you worked a long 14 week room (that’s the longest room ive ever worked btw) and let’s also be generous and say you only have 60% in expenses so the take home is $28,000. average rent in los angeles is around $2,800-$3,000. if you’re paying $2,800 in rent that means you need AT LEAST $4,000 a month to have a semi decent life since you need to also cover groceries, gas, medical expenses, toiletries, phone, internet, utilities, rental and car insurances, car payments, student loan payments, etc etc etc. and again, this is los angeles. everything is more expensive so you’re living BARE BONES on 4k. and these are numbers as a single person. im not even taking having children into account. so those $28,000 you take home might cover your life for 6-7 months. 3 of which you’re in the room working. the reality is that once that room ends, you might not work in a room again for 6-9-12 months (i have friends whose last jobs were over 18 months ago) and you now only have about 3 months left of savings to hold you over. we have to make that money stretch while we do all the endless free development we do for studios and until we get our next paying job. so…3 months left of enough money to cover your expenses -> possible 9 months of not having a job. this is how writers end up on food stamps or applying to work at target.

this is why we’re fighting for better rates and better residuals. residuals were a thing writers used to rely on to get them through the unemployment periods. residual checks have gone down from 20k to $0.03 cents. im not joking.

image

they’ve decimated our regular pay and then destroyed residuals. we have nothing left. so don’t believe it when they tell you writers are being greedy. writers are simply fighting to be able to make a middle class living. we’re not asking them to become poor for our sake. we’re asking for raises that amount to 2% of their profit. TWO PERCENT. this is a fight for writing even being a career in five years instead of something you do on the side while you work retail to pay your bills. if you think shows are bad now imagine when your writer has to do it as a hobby because they need a real job to pay their bills and support a family. (which none of us can currently afford to have btw)

support writers. stop being bootlickers for billion dollar corporations. stop caring about fictional people more than you care about the real people that write them. if we don’t win this fight it truly is game over. the industry as you know it is gone.

fetus-cakes:

the-bluebonnet-bandit:

the-bluebonnet-bandit:

halfhardtorock:

reblogging to normalize. because we really should be uplifting sex workers as bread winners. Also because they should be able to show their face in public without fear of repercussions??? (cough cough), like this gentleman.

Honestly its unhinged and hilarious but yet also seriously something I want to see more of

screenshot of a notification of user eigenblogging's reblog. They say: "nah absolutely not, shit like this is literally propaganda to turn young people into cheap whores. Even if he made that... [trails off] [hashtag] seeing shit like this makes me violently angry [hashtag] vid"
image described in alt text

Anyway…👀

Reblog if you’re a cheap whore. Or respect cheap whores. Or have the power to turn young people into cheap whores. (they can never tell which)

support whores both cheap and expensive!

sunrisenebula:

maaarine:

image
image
image
image
image
image
image
image
image
image
image

@W_Asherah

My mother does this to me 24/7. It’s so fucking exhausting.

shutyourmoustache:

When my mother forgets a word, she is the queen of coming up with new words. Words that would take a third National Treasure movie to fully decipher. I was talking to her yesterday, and she said this: “You know the time for los jibbities is coming up. You must be so excited!” Oh, is it time for los jibbities already? I must have missed it on my calendar. Are we celebrating something? “Of course! We should all be celebrating, shouldn’t we?” OK, so los jibbities is a happy thing. It’s not like something is giving you the heebie-jeebies, which would have been my one and only guess. “Los heebie-jeebies? Now you’re making things up...and this is my show.” You’re right. The time for los jibbities is coming up. Is this a season? “Yes, the season for love. The season for pride.” OK, los jibbities. “Yeah, sound it out.” Los…jibbities. LGBTs! “Sí, mira cuz you’re gay!” “You couldn’t just say pride season? You couldn’t just… *laughs*

prettybridgertons:

image
image
image
image
image
image
image
image
image

bridgerton aesthetics - kathani sharma-bridgerton

thefingerfuckingfemalefury:

ikindamaybewanthertositonmyface:

keybladesoras:

Trini and Kimberly Deleted Locker Scene.

We were truly robbed that this movie never got a sequel. It was SO FUCKING GOOD… :(

LET THEM RETURN AND LET THEM KISSSSSSSSS

blarffy:

image
image

leaning mattress

for when your house is a bit junky but not THAT junky.

  • the mattress from basement treasures freed from the shackles of the heart bed frame
  • mesh + texture edit
  • three levels of dirt nasty
  • kit not required - bgc

download !! (always free)

alexseanchai:

katyscartoons:

Next time transphobes call trans healthcare “experimental” you can show them this

Hysterectomy for trans men 1917 Vaginoplasty for trans women 1923 HRT for cis women 1935 Chemotherapy 1946 HRT for trans people 1949 Phalloplasty for trans men 1951 Birth control pill 1957 Hip replacement 1962 IUD 1964 Heart transplant 1967 MMR vaccine 1971 Puberty blockers for cis kids 1980 Hepatitis A vaccine 1992 Puberty blockers for trans kids 1994 HPV vaccine 2006 Uterus transplant 2011ALT

penicillin was first discovered in 1928; vaginoplasty is less experimental

ibuprofen was first discovered in 1961; phalloplasty and HRT are less experimental

Adderall was first applied as an ADHD treatment in 1994; puberty blockers are less experimental

soberscientistlife:

image

People that are alive because of socialist policies, but are too stupid to realize it.

Hello! Apologies if you've answered a similar request before but do you have any recs for regency era romance with an older woman/younger man couple? Thanks!

Asked by Anonymous

No worries! I would recommend trying:

Thief of Shadows by Elizabeth Hoyt. It’s Georgian, which I kind of? Prefer? To Regency? But tbh, I don’t think you’ll see a huge difference, especially because the hero is poor and therefore doesn’t wear wigs. One of my allll time favorites, virgin vigilante hero a widow heroine who’s six years older than him and high society. SUPER sexy, extremely romantic, great interclass romance. He’s 26 and she’s 32, so the age gap isn’t huge but it is a plot point because the heroine’s life experiences have made her feel old. TW: discussion of past miscarriages and infertility, hero is a vigilante who saves children from sex trafficking so this is discussed but not shown explicitly

The Countess by Sophie Jordan. Heroine is married and her daughter is a debutante; her shitty husband has found a rich match for said daughter, but said suitor is more interested in the heroine… I think our heroine is 38, and the hero is around 33? Regency or Victorian. TW: husband is emotionally abusive and does veer up on physical abuse towards the end of the book, though it isn’t heavy

Waiting for a Scot Like You by Eva Leigh. Another Regency or Victorian. Heroine is a widow with three grown children who’s on her way to an orgy–the hero is a Scottish soldier who’s been assigned to act as her bodyguard on the journey. He’s 34, she’s 46. Very hot and life-affirming.

Suddenly You by Lisa Kleypas. Heroine is an author who wants to lose her virginity and orders a sex worker–a hot man shows up on her doorstep and she assumes he’s it, but he’s actually a publisher who wants to steal her away. I think the heroine is 30 and he’s 25. TW: miscarriage.

The Return of the Duke by Lorraine Heath. Hero was a duke’s son, but his father was arrested and executed for conspiring to assassinate Queen Victoria. Now years later he’s out for revenge… and seeks out his father’s old mistress, who’s about five years older than him? Obviously Victorian. This one is HOT and there’s some angry resentment shit going on. TW: discussion of medical trauma and infertility.

Upcoming releases, both out 5/23:

The Dueling Duchess by Minerva Spencer. Heroine is a French sharpshooter in a circus, hero is a displaced former duke she had a fling with before they broke up. Now he’s back and needs a job! She’s 36, I think he’s around 32ish? Very sexy, he’s a total rake in love. TW: discussion of infant loss in the past.

Her Study in Scandal by Megan Frampton. Regency or Victorian. Heroine is a new widow and heads out to a pleasure garden to have some fun because her marriage was so boring. She meets this hot guy who rocks her world, only to find out the next day that he’s supposed to get engaged to her daughter! Heroine is 40, hero is 28. It’s very sexy and a bit lighter than many historicals with this trope.